A Delhi court, which framed charges against four accused in the 2000 cricket match-fixing scandal case, revealed that some matches of the India-South Africa test and ODI series were fixed, and attempts were made to fix other fixtures.
The two Tests and five one-day internationals were held from February 19 to March 19, 2000.
Wenesday Rate
Wednesday01 Jan. 2025
The court stated, “Investigation also concluded that some of the matches were fixed and an attempt was made to fix some other matches.”
Citing the investigation, the court noted that in the first test match at Mumbai from February 24 to 28, “It was decided that the South African Team will not score more than 250 runs in an inning, evident from the statements of Pieter Strydom and Hansie Cronje before the King’s Commission.”
Regarding the second test match at Bengaluru from March 2 to 6, the court observed, “Though Hansie Cronje had spoken to other players as per the statements made before the King’s Commission, this match was not fixed although an attempt was made to fix it.”
The court noted that the first ODI on March 9 in Kochi was a fixed match.
“The conversation recorded on March 16, 2000, wherein Hansie Cronje demands outstanding payment and Hansie Cronje’s statement before King’s Commission admitting receiving money from Sanjeev Chawla, clearly prove that the 1st One Day International was a fixed match,” it stated.
“Statement of Hansie Cronje made before the King’s Commission that he had informed Sanjay (alias Sanjeev Chawla) about losing the first One Day International is further corroborated by the statements of others made before the King’s Commission,” the court added.
For the second ODI at Jamshedpur on March 12, third ODI at Faridabad on March 15, and the fourth ODI at Baroda on March 17, the court noted that Cronje, in his statement before the King’s Commission, said that “he was forecasting as to what would happen.”
“Thus, though the matches were not fixed, it can be inferred that Hansie Cronje helped in giving inside information to the accused persons and helped them in placing bets and earning huge profits,” the court said.
“Though the players forgot about the deal in the heat of the game and did not play as per agreed terms, it can be concluded that a serious attempt was made to fix the match,” it added.
The court further noted, “From the recorded conversations, it is revealed that between the accused persons, large amounts of foreign exchange have also changed hands through hawala dealings for onward payment to the South African members who were part of the criminal conspiracy.”
