Published On : Fri, Oct 21st, 2022
By Nagpur Today Nagpur News

High Court acts tough over stray dog menace in Nagpur

Advertisement

In a warning of sorts, the HC directed the animal lovers to feed stray dogs in your own homes, not elsewhere

Nagpur: Taking a serious view of the menace of stray dogs in the Second Capital of Maharashtra, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court on Thursday directed all city authorities, including the police, to register cases against those obstructing civic officials from acting against menacing stray dogs. The HC directives have come as a warning to all animal lovers.

According to media reports, a Division Bench comprising Justice Sunil Shukre and Justice Anil Pansare also ordered that feeding of stray dogs shall not be done at any place except animal activists’ own homes. Such feeding and care shall be undertaken by anyone only after formally adopting and registering these dogs with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC). A penalty shall be imposed for feeding stray dogs out of the houses of feeders, ruled the High Court

Advertisement

The Bench made it clear that there will be no restriction on the NMC officials to take necessary action against menacing canines either by any rule or judgment. The authorities are free to capture stray dogs and remove them from the spot on the complaints by the citizens. They will also initiate an awareness programme by circulating the contact details of the ‘dog control cell’.

According to the petitioner, this is the first major decision by any HC after the Supreme Court clarified on October 12 that there would be no bar on HCs from hearing the issue of stray dogs. The directives came while hearing an intervention application filed by Dhantoli Nagrik Mandal. It was filed by social activist Vijay Talewar in 2006 praying for controlling the growing stray menace.

The petitioner had been complaining about the stray animals in Dhantoli and Congress Nagar areas, but hardly any steps were taken to control it. They named former Corporator Lakhan Yerawar who had proactively helped the citizens by catching these dogs and translocating them. However, activists and animal lovers objected to quoting SC verdicts and the drive stopped suddenly.